NIS is a not-for-profit, independent information service, which works to promote public awareness and foster debate on nuclear disarmament and related safety and environmental issues
Over fifty British universities funded by Atomic Weapons Establishment
More than fifty universities – over one third of all British universities – have received funding from the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE), the laboratory responsible for designing and manufacturing the UK's nuclear weapons, according to 'Atoms for Peace?' - a new study on AWE's research links published jointly by Nuclear Information Service and Medact (available to download at the bottom of the article).
The 'Technical Outreach' programme between AWE and universities mainly supports scientific research in the physics, materials science, high performance computing, modelling, and manufacturing disciplines.
Although much of this work qualifies as 'blue skies' research which is not aimed at any particular application, some of it is consided to have 'dual use' potential - the capability to be used for both benign, peaceful purposes and military purposes contributing to the development of weapons of mass destruction. The published aims of AWE's Technical Outreach programme clearly show that the Establishment's collaboration with universities is directly intended to allow AWE to maintain its capability as the UK's centre of expertise for military nuclear science.
However, the study concludes that as well as contributing to AWE's scientific research programmes, academic collaboration also plays an important role in helping to increase the perception of AWE as a reputable scientific institution, provides a pool of graduate recruits for staff posts at AWE, and allows the Establishment to draw on expertise and facilities at universities to support its work.
As well as providing direct financial payments to universities to undertake research work, AWE also funds academic posts and studentships and provides support for conferences and training. Five universities have agreed 'Strategic Alliances' with AWE (Bristol, Cambridge, Cranfield, Heriot-Watt and Imperial College) and receive long-term funding for wider research programmes.
AWE also has developed academic partnerships with government research laboratories such as the National Physical Laboratory and the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, professional scientific and engineering institutes, and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council and the Science and Technology Facilities Council.
Limited information is publicly available from official sources on research funded by AWE in UK universities, and the results of the two year investigation by Nuclear Information Service and Medact is believed to be the first time that information on the topic has been collected and subjected to open scrutiny.
The study concludes that ethical committees in universities and AWE itself should be more pro-active in providing advice to researchers who receive funds from AWE, that AWE should publish an annual report detailing the programmes it has funded in universities, and that an independent audit of the impact of AWE funding on research in universities should be periodically undertaken to assess the results, effectiveness, and value for money from such funding.
To help universities and researchers navigate ethical issues arising from participating in research work funded by AWE, the report presents a set of guidelines to help in considering professional and ethical issues related to such work.
Pete Wilkinson, Director of Nuclear Information Service said: “While some of the research work funded by the Atomic Weapons Establishment in British universities provides benefits to society and is welcome, work which will allow the UK to retain and develop its nuclear weapons over the long term has no place on the campus.
“Many scientists frown on research which contributes to the development of weapons of mass destruction, however indirectly, and our study found that AWE values its academic outreach programme as much for the acceptance it buys for AWE's own scientists in reputable academic circles as for its scientific findings.
“Universities and individual researchers are responsible for ensuring that their work meets accepted ethical standards, and our report aims to warn them of the risks from being seduced into murky waters by the lure of AWE's cash”.
Dr David McCoy, Chair of Medact said: “Many aspects of scientific research work funded by the Atomic Weapons Establishment are conducted in sensitive and controversial areas, raising complex ethical and legal issues.
“There are clear international norms against the use and possession of weapons of mass destruction, recognised by a number of international legal treaties, including the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and the Comprehensive Test-Ban Treaty, which require states holding nuclear weapons to take steps towards disarmament. Researchers should ask themselves whether a research programme is likely to support or undermine such norms before deciding to accept any funding from AWE”.