Nuclear Information Service

This region of the NIS site shows published records of UK government policy and parliamentary debates on nuclear weapons issues. It includes articles and links to the latest parliamentary debates; the views of media commentators and NGOs. The HANSARD section lists parliamentary questions and government ministers’ answers, which are a regular source of detailed information on all aspects of nuclear weapons manufacture, operations and military policy.

Flood map for AWE Burghfield. Shaded areas represent areas at significant risk of flooding, where the chance of flooding each year is greater than 1.3% (1 in 75).

events notice

NEW NIS Submission to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY CONSULTATION

Global Security: Non-Proliferation

NIS argues that the risks posed by British nuclear weapons production and road transport of warheads threaten each individual citizen and our way of life. Additionally, the risk of a criticality event at the substandard warhead assembly/disassembly facilities at AWE Burghfield is also unacceptable and unjustifiable.

Read the NIS submission to the FCO.

NIS questionnaire

Since its relaunch in February 2008, the NIS website has seen a growth of 300% in site visits, so clearly we're doing something right. Please complete this little questionaire and help us make it even better!

MOD Stops Live Nuclear Work at AWE due to preasure from NII over safety risks..
2007 Annual Report released by NIS.
A New Film Exposes Deadly Cargo on British Roads..

Hansard on Trident missiles, 14th Oct 2008

2008-10-14 14:00

*14 Oct 2008 : Column 1018W*

Trident Missiles

*Mr. Hancock:* To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the answer of 29 September 2008, /Official Report,/ column 2440W, on Trident missiles, how many Trident warheads are either operationally available or undergoing maintenance. [225908]

*Mr. Hutton:* The UK has fewer than 160 operationally available Trident warheads. I am withholding further information as its release would, or would be likely to, prejudice national security