	<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://nuclearinfo.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NIS Nuclear Information Service | nuclear weapons</title>
 <link>http://nuclearinfo.org</link>
 <description><div class='nav_infoheader'><div class='navinfoblockidL'><div class='nuclear_weapons_iblock'></div></div><div class='navinfoblockidR'><div class='nuclear_weapons_iblock'></div></div></div><div class='nav_infoinnercontent'>This section contains information about Britain's Trident nuclear weapon system; the development of a replacement system; military nuclear waste; nuclear materials transport; warhead transport and Nukewatch (UK), the citizen verification national transport monitoring network.

NIS provides data analysis of these movements based on Nukewatch information You can use the navigation links to the right to find information about both types of military nuclear transports, and about the monitoring network Nukewatch (UK), that works to highlight such movements and to raise concerns with both the public and decision-makers about safety and security issues.
</div></description>
 <language>en</language>
  <pubDate>2009-01-06 03:51</pubDate><item>
		 <title>NIS Update - AWE Planning Application submitted for Assembly/ Disassembly facility</title>
		 <link>http://nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear_weapons/a1971</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[<p>The application is rather large and is being put on the West Berks. Council Planning website today. In the meantime the reference number is 08/02287/COMIND  and the description is "Construction of main process facility (MPF) and support building with 16 lighting protector towers, associated plant building, gate houses, vehicles inspection bays, sub-station buildings, security fence, access roads, hardstanding and sustainable drainage system (SuDS) infrastructure."
</p>
<p>
This MOD Application is for AWE's proposed replacement Warhead Assembly/ Disassembly replacement facility, code-named MENSA after a star constellation. It is for the ‘Gravel Gerties (GGs)' in the Burghfield high security area, where warhead nuclear packages are combined with high explosives, arguably the most sensitive operation at AWE, requiring utmost safety protection for the workers, the local community and the whole country.</p>]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>Nuclear Submarine Not Welcome in Southampton Docks</title>
		 <link>http://nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear_weapons/a1970</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[<p>
Nuclear powered submarine, HMS Trafalgar arrived into Southampton Docks on Friday morning, before the Sotonsafe Nuclear Safety Plan is due to be tested on 14th January 2009. All emergency services and the City Council are on standby in case there is a problem with this 27 year-old submarine. The 5-day Public Relations Exercise and recruitment drive will be undermined by Trafalgar’s recent nuclear accident at Devonport Dockyard in Plymouth and the difficulty in protecting people in the Southampton area and beyond in the event of a nuclear accident.
</p>
<p>
<img src="/files/images/submarines/SCANS/SCANSdemoDec08_teaser.jpg" alt="SCANS demo in Southampton, Dec 08" width="250" height="162" /> 
</p>
]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>NIS UPDATE November 2008</title>
		 <link>http://nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear_weapons/a1965</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[<p>AWE Planning Application for Assembly/ Disassembly facility - AWE expects to apply to West Berkshire Council for planning permission around December 18th for its replacement Gravel Gerties in the Burghfield high security area. The Planning Officer has agreed to accept 
consultation responses and representations after the 21-day consultation period has officially expired. Update summary:</p><br/>
<ul style="margin-left:2px;">
<li style="border:0;list-style-type: square;">AWE Planning Application for Assembly/ Disassembly facility</li>
<li style="border:0;list-style-type: square;">Emergency Planning for Serious Floods</li>
<li style="border:0;list-style-type: square;">Change in ownership of AWE</li>
<li style="border:0;list-style-type: square;">NIS Legal Challenge of the replacement of Trident</li>
<li style="border:0;list-style-type: square;">more</li>
<li style="border:0;list-style-type:none;"></li>
</ul>




]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>Hansard on MOD handling of Burghfield AWE floods</title>
		 <link>http://nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear_weapons/a1957</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[MoD admit that flood defences at AWE Burghfield were not designed to cope with run-off from surrounding fields.]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>Nuclear Weapons not wanted in Scotland</title>
		 <link>http://nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear_weapons/a1960</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[Political row over the future of nuclear weapons at base
<p/>
24rd Oct 2008<br/>
by Tina Kemp, Scottish Lennox Herald
<p/>
A FRESH row has erupted over the future of Faslane Naval Base. Defence Secretary John Hutton visited the base last week to reinforce the government’s pledge to keep nuclear weapons in Scotland. But the SNP, which has committed itself to ridding the country of the weapons, used his visit to reinforce its message that Trident must go.
<p/>
<a href="http://www.lennoxherald.co.uk/dunbartonshire-news/dunbartonshire-news/helensburgh-news/2008/10/24/political-row-over-the-future-of-nuclear-weapons-at-base-114557-22085537/">http://www.lennoxherald.co.uk</a>

]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>SWAMPED !</title>
		 <link>http://nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear_weapons/a1952</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[<div style="font-size: 1.1em;"><p>
The devastating impact of the July 2007 floods
on Britain’s nuclear weapons factories</p>
</div>
<div style="max-width: 400px; text-align: left; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto">
<h4>Official documents reveal ‘near miss’ at nuclear weapons factory during 2007 floods - <span style="color: #f01000;">Channel 4 News 7pm Monday October 13th reports NIS story</span></h4>
<p>Live nuclear work suspended for nine months as a result of damage caused. Scale of flooding covered up by site managers.
</p>
<p>
A new NIS report, <a href="/view/nuclear_sites/accidents/a1952">'SWAMPED!'</a> looks at the effects of severe flooding at the top secret Atomic Weapons Establishment.
</p>
</div>
<!--
<div class="reveal">
<div class="clickedformore">
<div style="max-width: 400px; padding-bottom: 18px; text-align: left; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto">
The documents provided to NIS reveal that:
<ol>
	<li>
	Despite the scale of the crisis, a site emergency was not declared during the flooding and the government regulators responsible for the Burghfield site were not informed about the incident until two days afterwards.
	</li>
	<li>Radioactive material was still being recovered from buildings at AWE Burghfield nearly three weeks after the floods.
	</li>
	<li>
	Following the floods live nuclear work was suspended for nine months until buildings and emergency systems had been repaired.
	</li>
	<li>
	The site had a history of flooding, but a programme of remediation works had been neglected and emergency plans had overlooked many of the risks associated with flooding.
	</li>
	<li>
	The costs of the damage are likely to run to millions of pounds.
	</li>
	<li>
	Managers decided it was 'prudent' not to reveal the impact of the flooding to the public.
	</li>
</ol>
<p>
Despite the history of flooding at Burghfield, AWE are pushing ahead with a programme of building work intended to develop new facilities at the site which would allow the production of a new generation of warheads to replace Trident nuclear weapons. 
</p><p>
Di McDonald, Director of NIS said:  “AWE’s own review of the flood reveals that two facilities at Burghfield experienced ‘near miss’ events, and power and alarms to most of the site had to be shut down because of the scale of the flooding.
</p><p>
“Much of the impact of the storm could have been avoided if actions aimed at preventing flooding had been followed up by AWE, raising serious questions about management standards at a site which handles radioactive materials, high explosives, and hazardous chemicals. 
</p><p>
“Ironically, the nuclear weapons manufactured at Burghfield can do nothing to protect us against global climate change – by far the most urgent and serious threat we face to our security.” 
</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="clickformore">
/ more /
</div>
-->]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>Independent Nuclear Deterrent</title>
		 <link>http://nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear_weapons/a1947</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[From MOD annual report and accounts 07/08:
<p/>
"The UK’s Trident submarine force has
maintained a continuous and independent
nuclear deterrent capability at sea, in support
of NATO and as the ultimate guarantee of
our national security. In June 2007 HMS
Vengeance completed the 300th Continuous At
Sea Deterrence patrol. Since April 1969 there
has been a Royal Navy deterrent submarine
continuously on patrol somewhere in the world."]]></description>
		</item>
		</channel></rss>