	<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://nuclearinfo.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NIS Nuclear Information Service | policy</title>
 <link>http://nuclearinfo.org</link>
 <description><div class='nav_infoheader'><div class='navinfoblockidL'><div class='policy_iblock'></div></div><div class='navinfoblockidR'><div class='policy_iblock'></div></div></div><div class='nav_infoinnercontent'>This region of the NIS site shows published records of UK government policy and parliamentary debates on nuclear weapons issues. It includes articles and links to the latest parliamentary debates; the views of media commentators and NGOs. The HANSARD section lists parliamentary questions and government ministers’ answers, which are a regular source of detailed information on all aspects of nuclear weapons manufacture, operations and military policy.</div></description>
 <language>en</language>
  <pubDate>2009-01-06 01:34</pubDate><item>
		 <title>Emergency Planning for Climate Change</title>
		 <link>http://nuclearinfo.org/view/policy/a1967</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[<p>This Civil Contingencies (CC) Conference was organised by the Public Policy Exchange, in association with the Centre for Parliamentary Studies to facilitate policy discussion, debate and networking. It was attended by 25 delegates from the Maritime &amp; Coastguard Agency, Army, Navy, local Emergency Planning Officers (EPOs), Fire Services,the Scottish Executive, Academics a journalist and NIS (also representing NAG, Plymouth Peace Group and SCANS).</p>
]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>Hansard on AWE Aldermaston, Nov 4th 2008</title>
		 <link>http://nuclearinfo.org/view/policy/a1964</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[Norman Baker: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence when he expects a pre-construction safety report to be submitted to the Health and Safety Executive's Nuclear Installations Inspectorate on the planned construction of a uranium enrichment facility at AWE Aldermaston.]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>Hansard on MOD handling of Burghfield AWE floods</title>
		 <link>http://nuclearinfo.org/view/policy/a1957</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[MoD admit that flood defences at AWE Burghfield were not designed to cope with run-off from surrounding fields.]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>Hansard on Nuclear Weapons, 27th Oct 2008</title>
		 <link>http://nuclearinfo.org/view/policy/a1962</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[*Nick Harvey:* To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) whether US personnel will be asked to participate in his Department's work on the Warhead Pre-Concept Working Group;]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>Evidence of government multilateral disarmament gestures?</title>
		 <link>http://nuclearinfo.org/view/policy/a1958</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[New Secretary of State for Defence, John Hutton lists evidence of government multilateral disarmament gestures
but the fact remains that no UK bomb is on the table.]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>Burghfield AWE floods - Lib Dems call for inquiry</title>
		 <link>http://nuclearinfo.org/view/policy/a1956</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[The Liberal Democrats have called for a full public inquiry into <b>potentially catastrophic flooding</b> at the Atomic Weapons Establishment site at Burghfield, in Berkshire during the 2007 floods.
<p/>
Source: <a href="http://www.nce.co.uk/news/2008/10/opposition_calls_for_inquiry_after_near_flooding_of_nuclear_sites.html">New Civil Engineer 14th Oct 2008</a>


]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>NEW NIS Submission to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY CONSULTATION</title>
		 <link>http://nuclearinfo.org/view/policy/a1955</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[<small>Global Security: Non-Proliferation</small>
<p/>
NIS argues that the risks posed by British nuclear weapons production and road transport of warheads threaten each individual citizen and our way of life. Additionally,
the risk of a criticality event at the substandard warhead assembly/disassembly facilities at AWE Burghfield is also unacceptable and unjustifiable.
<p/>
Read the <a href="/files/Sub.%20to%20FCO%20Sept%2008.pdf">NIS submission to the FCO</a>.]]></description>
		</item>
		</channel></rss>