2013 This report examines the “damage criteria” used by the MOD in planning the UK’s nuclear weapons programme and more recent replacements, and how a desire for particular weapons systems has reshaped the amount of damage considered acceptable. By John Ainslie Download if the embedded viewer has a problem
Tag: Russia
-
Unacceptable Damage
-
If Britain Fired Trident
2013 A study of the humanitarian consequences of a nuclear attack by one Trident submarine on likely primary targets in and around Moscow. By John Ainslie Download if the embedded viewer has a problem
-
Times, ‘Who will see off the Spetsnaz.’
18 September 1985.
-
New Statesman, ‘Zircon Why MPs didn’t want to know.’
11 December 1987.
-
Daily Express, Ian Mather, ‘Dad’s Army set to stamp out Kremlin’s moles.’
08 September 1985.
-
Observer, ‘Reagan’s men raid Russia.’
30 August 1987.
-
John Ainslie notes, Boris Yeltsin Baltic states, targets for Trident
no date
-
Daily Mirror, Mark Dowdney, The Great Nuclear Escape
25 March 1994
-
Daily Record, A necessary nuclear evil
no date
-
Daily Record, Gary Jones, US hears sounds of sub breaking apart
18 August 2000
-
Pravda, ‘The Pentagon is developing a new weapon to obtain absolute predominance.’
30 May 2006.
-
Neptune papers, Nuclear warships and naval nuclear weapons, William Arkin
May 1988
