2013 This report examines the “damage criteria” used by the MOD in planning the UK’s nuclear weapons programme and more recent replacements, and how a desire for particular weapons systems has reshaped the amount of damage considered acceptable. By John Ainslie Download if the embedded viewer has a problem
Tag: Warhead
-
Unacceptable Damage
-
The Scotsman, Report on Polaris warheads way out
7 January 1991
-
Carey Sublette, Fogbank
no date
-
UK nuclear weapons, Warhead movements 2001-2004
no date
-
US Government, Nuclear warhead and missile refurbishment and life extension
no date
-
Verifying Warhead Dismantlement Past, Present, Future, David Cliff, Hassan Elbahtimy, Andreas Persbo, Vertic
2010
-
Ainslie notes, Combination of relative factors, UK Warhead replacement
no date
-
Ainslie notes, Fogbank
6 March 2008
-
Washington Post, Pentagon seeks to fund new force of conventional warhead missiles, Ann Scott Tyson
8 March 2006
-
Edward Russick et al, Removable Encapsulants for the W76 Upgrade, Sandia National Laboratories
No date
-
UK AWE, Trident warhead numbers 2000-2006
No date
-
Ainslie notes, A possible mix on each submarines
No date
