03 April 2005.
Tag: Warhead
-
-
Ainslie notes, ‘U.S. Role in UK Warhead Production.’
No date.
-
Global Security.org ‘W76-0/Mk4, pages 1 & 2 of 3.’
No date.
-
Sandia National Laboratories, Scott Klenke, W76-1/MK4A JT4A-2B Normal Environment and Model Validation Test Team.’
August 2003.
-
John Ainslie, UK-US 1958 Mutual Defence Agreement, ‘Joint Working Groups, JOWOG.’
No date.
-
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Scott Doebling, ‘Validation of Quasi-Static Reentry Engineering Analysis of a W76 Surrogate Article, Part I: Overview of Systematic Validation Process.’
September 2003.
-
US Nuclear Weapons, ‘Table B-1 Calorific Measurements and Anion Analyses of Fe/KCIO Heat Pellets taken from W76 and W68 Thermal Batteries.’
No date.
-
Albuquerque Journal, John Fleck, ‘Scientist Says Nuke Warhead Isn’t Reliable.’
29 October 2004.
-
Albuquerque Journal, John Fleck, ‘Flaws Seen in Sub-Launched Nuclear Warhead.’
08 July 2004.
-
Global Security.org ‘W76-0/Mk4.’
22 February 2004.
-
US Nuclear Weapons, Accelerated Strategic Computing Initiative (ASCI), Department of Energy, ‘Appendix A: Level-1 Milestones, pages 38-45.’
2005.
-
US Government, Sandia National Laboratories, Sandia Lab News, ‘Labs Accomplishments: Nuclear weapons.’
February 2007.
